-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 91
Pinned WW top at 0.4.2 and bottom at 0.4.1 #2460
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2460 +/- ##
=====================================
Coverage 99.7% 99.7%
=====================================
Files 283 283
Lines 25500 25500
=====================================
Hits 25400 25400
Misses 100 100 Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
core-requirements.txt
Outdated
| shap>=0.36.0 | ||
| texttable>=1.6.2 | ||
| woodwork>=0.4.1 | ||
| woodwork>=0.4.1,<=0.4.2 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we do woodwork>=0.4.1,<0.5.0? If they follow semantic versioning, 0.5.0 will be the next breaking change
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agreed, <0.5.0 is the right approach, and will avoid the upcoming breaking change.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@chukarsten Looks good to me once we set the upper version at < 5.0.0! Thank you!
Updated upper limit
In preparation for woodwork 0.5.0 release and evaluate the new type in #2459 .