-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 91
Add comments to doctests #3155
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add comments to doctests #3155
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3155 +/- ##
=====================================
Coverage 99.7% 99.7%
=====================================
Files 318 318
Lines 30948 30948
=====================================
Hits 30843 30843
Misses 105 105
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
| Returns: | ||
| dict: dict with a DataCheckError if parameters are too big for the split sizes. | ||
| Examples: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Realized there were no tests for TimeSeriesParametersDataCheck so I took this opportunity to add one
freddyaboulton
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @ParthivNaresh this looks great!!
Fixes: #3035
Previous docs:

New docs: Added comments and split code blocks

After creating the pull request: in order to pass the release_notes_updated check you will need to update the "Future Release" section of
docs/source/release_notes.rstto include this pull request by adding :pr:123.