-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 87
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ignore sorting of time index via woodwork for DataChecks #3723
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3723 +/- ##
=======================================
+ Coverage 99.7% 99.7% +0.1%
=======================================
Files 338 338
Lines 34659 34672 +13
=======================================
+ Hits 34527 34540 +13
Misses 132 132
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice! Good catch
Might be good to add a test to ensure that this is upheld as expected |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also looks good to me, but agree with @bchen1116 on testing. Could be an integration test or tempo test as well if that's easier.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for adding the test!
"1/10/21", | ||
"1/4/21", | ||
] | ||
y = pd.Series([i for i in range(9)]) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
could shorthand this to y = pd.Series(range(9))
No description provided.