Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ignore sorting of time index via woodwork for DataChecks #3723

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Sep 27, 2022

Conversation

ParthivNaresh
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 20, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #3723 (c6264e9) into main (1230dbf) will increase coverage by 0.1%.
The diff coverage is 100.0%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##            main   #3723     +/-   ##
=======================================
+ Coverage   99.7%   99.7%   +0.1%     
=======================================
  Files        338     338             
  Lines      34659   34672     +13     
=======================================
+ Hits       34527   34540     +13     
  Misses       132     132             
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
evalml/data_checks/data_checks.py 100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
evalml/tests/data_checks_tests/test_data_checks.py 100.0% <100.0%> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

@ParthivNaresh ParthivNaresh marked this pull request as ready for review September 21, 2022 14:15
Copy link
Contributor

@bchen1116 bchen1116 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! Good catch

@bchen1116
Copy link
Contributor

Might be good to add a test to ensure that this is upheld as expected

Copy link

@Cmancuso Cmancuso left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also looks good to me, but agree with @bchen1116 on testing. Could be an integration test or tempo test as well if that's easier.

Copy link
Contributor

@bchen1116 bchen1116 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for adding the test!

"1/10/21",
"1/4/21",
]
y = pd.Series([i for i in range(9)])
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

could shorthand this to y = pd.Series(range(9))

@ParthivNaresh ParthivNaresh merged commit 16478b0 into main Sep 27, 2022
@ParthivNaresh ParthivNaresh deleted the datacheck_maintain_time_index branch September 27, 2022 16:30
@chukarsten chukarsten mentioned this pull request Sep 27, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants