Skip to content

Revert "Add pipeline.should_skip_featurization flag (#3849)" #3862

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 29, 2022

Conversation

eccabay
Copy link
Contributor

@eccabay eccabay commented Nov 28, 2022

This reverts adding the should_skip_featurization_flag, since it introduced a release-blocking bug.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 28, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #3862 (c4a258c) into main (3c91659) will decrease coverage by 0.1%.
The diff coverage is 100.0%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##            main   #3862     +/-   ##
=======================================
- Coverage   99.7%   99.7%   -0.0%     
=======================================
  Files        344     344             
  Lines      36190   36185      -5     
=======================================
- Hits       36053   36048      -5     
  Misses       137     137             
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
.../integration_tests/test_time_series_integration.py 100.0% <ø> (ø)
evalml/pipelines/time_series_pipeline_base.py 100.0% <100.0%> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

@eccabay eccabay marked this pull request as ready for review November 28, 2022 21:47
@eccabay eccabay requested review from jeremyliweishih, christopherbunn and chukarsten and removed request for jeremyliweishih November 28, 2022 21:47
@eccabay eccabay enabled auto-merge (squash) November 28, 2022 21:48
@chukarsten chukarsten disabled auto-merge November 29, 2022 18:05
@chukarsten chukarsten merged commit 40fc693 into main Nov 29, 2022
@chukarsten chukarsten deleted the revert_skip_feat branch November 29, 2022 18:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants