-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 87
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hid non-essential warning messages in time series docs #3890
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3890 +/- ##
=====================================
Coverage 99.7% 99.7%
=====================================
Files 346 346
Lines 36358 36358
=====================================
Hits 36227 36227
Misses 131 131 Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good!
Should we file a follow up issue to track removing those parameter not used warnings? It seems like those shouldn't be raised in the first place.
Unrelated to this issue, I'm concerned by the fact that we're getting info-level logging information. We shouldn't be, since verbose
is set to false. I think one of our dependencies may be mucking with the logging configuration, which is something for us to keep an eye on.
docs/source/release_notes.rst
Outdated
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ Release Notes | |||
* Changes | |||
* Added a threshold to ``DateTimeFormatDataCheck`` to account for too many duplicate or nan values :pr:`3883` | |||
* Documentation Changes | |||
* Hide non-essential warning messages in time series docs :pr:`3890` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we do past tense 🥲
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
5c8f037
to
f428d1d
Compare
Fixes #3620
A lot of the warning messages that we are seeing has to do with a lot of the internal solvers being unable to find convergence. A significant amount of these errors can be filtered out by filtering them in a hidden cell.
In addition, for the known in advance section, a number of errors are
UserErrors
related to initial parameter inits in addition to the above convergence error messages. This second cell hiding UserErrors I am a bit more skeptical about as it's a bit broad and leaves room for actual errors to be hidden in the future.Current page: https://evalml.alteryx.com/en/stable/user_guide/timeseries.html#Known-in-advance-features
Updated page: https://feature-labs-inc-evalml--3890.com.readthedocs.build/en/3890/user_guide/timeseries.html#Known-in-advance-features