Check base_of_exclude attribute on Primitive

[jeff-hernandez]

Currently, we check the base_of_exclude attribute on Feature classes instead of Primitive classes which raises an error.

Example

from woodwork.column_schema import ColumnSchema
import featuretools as ft
import woodwork as ww


class Abs(ft.primitives.TransformPrimitive):
    input_types = [ColumnSchema(semantic_tags={'numeric'})]
    name = 'abs'

    def get_function(self):
        return abs

class Sum(ft.primitives.AggregationPrimitive):
    input_types = [ColumnSchema(semantic_tags={'numeric'})]
    base_of_exclude = [Abs]
    name = 'sum'

    def get_function(self):
        return sum

es = ft.demo.load_mock_customer(return_entityset=True)

fd = ft.dfs(
    entityset=es,
    features_only=True,
    agg_primitives=[Sum],
    target_dataframe_name='customers',
)

AttributeError: 'AggregationFeature' object has no attribute 'base_of_exclude'

Related to #1739

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1749 (e2da4e2) into main (c7ee73c) will increase coverage by 0.07%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1749      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   98.63%   98.71%   +0.07%     
==========================================
  Files         138      138              
  Lines       15373    15377       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits        15163    15179      +16     
+ Misses        210      198      -12     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
featuretools/synthesis/deep_feature_synthesis.py	98.23% <100.00%> (+0.44%)	⬆️
...aturetools/tests/primitive_tests/test_agg_feats.py	97.92% <100.00%> (+0.02%)	⬆️
featuretools/tests/conftest.py	100.00% <0.00%> (+0.40%)	⬆️
...utational_backend/test_calculate_feature_matrix.py	99.45% <0.00%> (+0.65%)	⬆️
...computational_backends/calculate_feature_matrix.py	99.42% <0.00%> (+0.85%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c7ee73c...e2da4e2. Read the comment docs.

[rwedge]

if stack_on and base_of are both set to []. check_stacking will return False even if test_primitive is not in base_of_exclude

[jeff-hernandez]

Oh okay, interesting. I changed stack_on and base_of to None so they can return True. It kind of seems like whether None or [] the value should be the same.

[rwedge]

I think None means no whitelist while [] means an empty whitelist, so nothing allowed

[rwedge]

LGTM