Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add form for testing Spark or Dask to documentation #545

Merged
merged 2 commits into from May 17, 2019
Merged

Conversation

kmax12
Copy link
Contributor

@kmax12 kmax12 commented May 16, 2019

Adding a form to the documentation for users who want to test the Featuretools Enterprise Spark or Dask implementation

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 16, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #545 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #545   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.29%   96.29%           
=======================================
  Files         115      115           
  Lines        9151     9151           
=======================================
  Hits         8812     8812           
  Misses        339      339

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 8ebc46a...08f48bf. Read the comment docs.

@kmax12 kmax12 requested a review from rwedge May 16, 2019 22:32
Copy link
Collaborator

@rwedge rwedge left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good

@kmax12 kmax12 merged commit 96c42ec into master May 17, 2019
@rwedge rwedge mentioned this pull request May 17, 2019
@rwedge rwedge deleted the form-dask-spark branch February 19, 2021 21:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants