Skip to content

Replace n_unique with num_unique in docs #599

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 14, 2019
Merged

Replace n_unique with num_unique in docs #599

merged 3 commits into from
Jun 14, 2019

Conversation

CJStadler
Copy link
Contributor

The name of the primitive was changed in #510, so n_unique is no longer valid.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 13, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #599 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #599   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.48%   96.48%           
=======================================
  Files         117      117           
  Lines        9609     9609           
=======================================
  Hits         9271     9271           
  Misses        338      338
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
featuretools/wrappers/sklearn.py 95.65% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
featuretools/synthesis/dfs.py 100% <ø> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5ff1127...90f7168. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Contributor

@gsheni gsheni left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good

@CJStadler CJStadler merged commit 8f07396 into master Jun 14, 2019
@CJStadler CJStadler deleted the docs-n-unique branch June 14, 2019 12:47
@rwedge rwedge mentioned this pull request Jun 19, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants