Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix progress bar undercounting #743

merged 5 commits into from Sep 18, 2019


Copy link

@kmax12 kmax12 commented Sep 16, 2019

The current logic undercounts the progress. This PR fixes how we do the count.

Added a test case

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 18, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #743 into master will increase coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #743      +/-   ##
+ Coverage   97.65%   97.65%   +<.01%     
  Files         118      118              
  Lines       10356    10364       +8     
+ Hits        10113    10121       +8     
  Misses        243      243
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
featuretools/tests/synthesis/ 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
...computational_backends/ 98.23% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
...utational_backend/ 99.37% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
...s/computational_backends/ 98.23% <100%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 67322e5...6680785. Read the comment docs.

@kmax12 kmax12 changed the title [WIP] Fix progress bar undercounting Fix progress bar undercounting Sep 18, 2019
Copy link

@angela97lin angela97lin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Glad you were able to track down the num_features undercounting!

@kmax12 kmax12 merged commit 2ff8d17 into master Sep 18, 2019
@kmax12 kmax12 deleted the fix-progress-bar-undercounting branch September 18, 2019 15:06
@rwedge rwedge mentioned this pull request Sep 30, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
None yet
None yet

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants