Draft for board membership terms, criteria and recruiting new members #20

Closed
jukervin opened this Issue Sep 14, 2015 · 9 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
4 participants
@jukervin
Member

jukervin commented Sep 14, 2015

No description provided.

@jukervin jukervin self-assigned this Sep 14, 2015

@jukervin

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@jukervin

jukervin Sep 14, 2015

Member

Discussion from the board call:

  • Three year with possibility to renew suggested.
  • Divide members to three group and first group would be up for re-election next year.
  • Chair rotation discussed. Maybe chair selection should be handled during face-to-face meeting.
  • Frederik and Jukka will make changes to existing criteria as a draft.
Member

jukervin commented Sep 14, 2015

Discussion from the board call:

  • Three year with possibility to renew suggested.
  • Divide members to three group and first group would be up for re-election next year.
  • Chair rotation discussed. Maybe chair selection should be handled during face-to-face meeting.
  • Frederik and Jukka will make changes to existing criteria as a draft.
@Jo-CCS

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@Jo-CCS

Jo-CCS Sep 14, 2015

Member

Propose to adapt to 2-year time frame and accordingly to adapt to 2 groups.
Also change of position / company should be reason to re-confirm position on the board.

Member

Jo-CCS commented Sep 14, 2015

Propose to adapt to 2-year time frame and accordingly to adapt to 2 groups.
Also change of position / company should be reason to re-confirm position on the board.

@cowboyMontana

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@cowboyMontana

cowboyMontana Sep 14, 2015

Member

I'm in favor of 3 year term with 3 groups so as to reduce the possibility of board member churn and maintain at least 2/3 of the board with a experience on the board.

Member

cowboyMontana commented Sep 14, 2015

I'm in favor of 3 year term with 3 groups so as to reduce the possibility of board member churn and maintain at least 2/3 of the board with a experience on the board.

@cowboyMontana

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@cowboyMontana

cowboyMontana Oct 12, 2015

Member

Added proposed additions about member terms to board membership criteria. Please review.

Member

cowboyMontana commented Oct 12, 2015

Added proposed additions about member terms to board membership criteria. Please review.

@jukervin

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@jukervin

jukervin Oct 14, 2015

Member

Shall the new members be approved unanimously?
OT: Should archives be added in the list of membership criteria institutions?

Member

jukervin commented Oct 14, 2015

Shall the new members be approved unanimously?
OT: Should archives be added in the list of membership criteria institutions?

@jukervin

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@jukervin

jukervin Nov 6, 2015

Member

Discussion from a meeting:

  • membership voting same as with the issues
Member

jukervin commented Nov 6, 2015

Discussion from a meeting:

  • membership voting same as with the issues
@ntra00

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@ntra00

ntra00 Nov 6, 2015

Member

I think maybe we need an exception for board membership for a Library of Congress representative. We feel there should always be someone from LC.

Member

ntra00 commented Nov 6, 2015

I think maybe we need an exception for board membership for a Library of Congress representative. We feel there should always be someone from LC.

@jukervin

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@jukervin

jukervin Nov 6, 2015

Member
  • One of the board members shall be from Library of Congress?
Member

jukervin commented Nov 6, 2015

  • One of the board members shall be from Library of Congress?
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment