πŸ“Š πŸ“„ Survey experiment about how donors respond to NGOs facing legal trouble abroad
Switch branches/tags
Clone or download
Fetching latest commit…
Cannot retrieve the latest commit at this time.
Permalink
Type Name Latest commit message Commit time
Failed to load latest commit information.
Manuscript
files
html
img
lib
text
.gitattributes
.gitignore
01_clean-data.Rmd
02_analysis.Rmd
03_additional-analysis.Rmd
LICENSE.md
Makefile
README.md
_site.yml
experiment.Rmd
index.Rmd
ngo-crackdowns-philanthropy.Rproj
preregistration.Rmd

README.md

The effect of NGO crackdowns on individual philanthropy

Suparna Chaudhry β€’ Department of Political Science β€’ Christopher Newport University
Andrew Heiss β€’ Romney Institute of Public Service and Ethics β€’ Brigham Young University


Requires the safesite package to build the complete site, due to environment bleeding:

devtools::install_github("andrewheiss/rmarkdown-website-envs", subdir = "safesite")

Abstract

State crackdown on non-governmental organizations (NGOs), particularly through legal restrictions on funding, has become increasingly common. How do legal restrictions on NGOs impact patterns of private philanthropic giving and individual donor decision-making? With reduced funding for NGOs working on contentious issues, and an absence of philanthropic culture in many developing countries, many NGOs rely on funds from private donors in Western countries. Using a survey experiment, we explore how this crackdown changes donors' preferences based on the issue area and funding sources of the NGO. We find that private donors are responsive to the legal difficulties international NGOs face abroad and are more likely to donate to legally besieged privately funded human rights NGOs. Additionally, already-likely donors give substantially more to legally restricted NGOs working on humanitarian issues. We conclude by discussing the implications for the sustainability of NGOs working abroad.