Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

License Question #42

Open
spectejb opened this issue Jul 26, 2018 · 3 comments
Open

License Question #42

spectejb opened this issue Jul 26, 2018 · 3 comments

Comments

@spectejb
Copy link

@andris9 - Two license questions for you:

-Would you be willing to update to EUPL 1.2? It adds more compatible licenses in the Appendix.
-Would you be willing to dual license with MIT, BSD or Apache in case companies are more comfortable with permissive?

Both recommendations would be helpful with increasing adoption of mimelib across the board!

Thanks, in advance, for your consideration!

@andris9
Copy link
Owner

andris9 commented Jul 27, 2018

Do you really need to use the mimelib module? This module is deprecated in favour of MIT-licensed libmime (not 100% compatible though). If you do still need to use mimelib then could you clarify what for/how you are using it?

@spectejb
Copy link
Author

spectejb commented Aug 7, 2018

We are actually not sure. It is being picked up by our scanning software and showing up in our reports. Therefore, it is used within a dependency somewhere. (I know. Not very helpful)

@szeist
Copy link

szeist commented Oct 29, 2021

Hi! :)
We run into the same: Some of our developers consider using Go-logrus-elasticsearch v. 1.0.2 (https://github.com/interactive-solutions/go-logrus-elasticsearch/releases).
We noticed that most of the project repositories are licensed under MIT, and would like to confirm whether MIT also applies for the above mentioned repository?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants