Skip to content
On the internet, nobody knows you're a dog
Ruby HTML JavaScript Shell CSS
Branch: master
Clone or download
dependabot and thiagoarrais Bump rack from 1.6.10 to 1.6.11 in /worker (#26)
Bumps [rack]( from 1.6.10 to 1.6.11.
- [Release notes](
- [Changelog](
- [Commits](rack/rack@1.6.10...1.6.11)

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <>
Latest commit ec29a4f Nov 1, 2019
Type Name Latest commit message Commit time
Failed to load latest commit information.
.github Create repo Sponsorship button May 29, 2019
deploy rotate redis password Oct 10, 2018
worker Bump rack from 1.6.10 to 1.6.11 in /worker (#26) Nov 1, 2019
.gitignore Start deploying the stuff to dedicated environments Mar 21, 2017 Added (optional) Nov 22, 2017
LICENSE Add MIT license Sep 28, 2018 typo! Sep 24, 2018


Backers on Open Collective Sponsors on Open Collective

Woof! On the internet, nobody knows you're a dog.

Is your identity influencing the way project mantainers look at your pull requests? I can shed some light on that question!

I'm a bot (or a dog -- you'll never know for sure) that helps you stay anonymous on github.

To use me, add the anonydog extesion to your browser (available on Firefox and Chrome) and select "anonymous pull request" when opening your next PR.

If you'd rather do the process manually:

  1. Go to and tell me which github repo you want to work on.
  2. Instead of forking anyuser/anyrepo, fork anonydog/anyrepo
  3. Create a branch and work as you normally would
  4. When you're done, open a pull request to anonydog/anyrepo

When I see that, I'll flip a magical coin and either (1) open the pull request to the original repo on your behalf or (2) strip your name from every possible author field and submit a pull request under my own name.

Don't worry. If your pull request gets accepted, I will reveal your github handle so that you can get credit for it.


This, as most things, started as a conversation. @isislovecruft mentioned that they had been testing gnupg developers by using male and female pseudonyms. It didn't take long for someone to suggest automating that.

What would happen if a bot automatically anonymized opensource contributors?

What if it could randomly choose between anonymizing and not anonymizing?

Will some demographic groups get code merged more/less frequently when they're anonymous?

Get in touch

In case you're interested in helping or using anonydog, open an issue and we'll talk.


This project exists thanks to all the people who contribute. [Contribute].


Thank you to all our backers! 🙏 [Become a backer]


Support this project by becoming a sponsor. Your logo will show up here with a link to your website. [Become a sponsor]

You can’t perform that action at this time.