Define processor topology on s390x #80088
Draft
+22
−5
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Yaakov Selkowitz <yselkowi@redhat.com>
ansibot
added
WIP
mkrizek
removed
the
needs_triage
ansibot
added
the
stale_ci
ansibot
added
the
needs_revision
ansibot
added
the
needs_rebase
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
SUMMARY
This is a continuation of #79806, using processor topology on s390x hosts where available (5.7+ kernel with
CONFIG_SCHED_TOPOLOGY) to define a more accurateprocessor_countvalue ("sockets", like on x86 hosts).ISSUE TYPE
COMPONENT NAME
facts
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The modified test case shows the effect of this patch.
/cc @nitzmahone