docs: Update CONTRIBUTORS.md with the latest contributors#6330
Closed
pyansys-automation wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
Closed
docs: Update CONTRIBUTORS.md with the latest contributors#6330pyansys-automation wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
CONTRIBUTORS.md with the latest contributors#6330pyansys-automation wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
Conversation
Contributor
|
Thanks for opening a Pull Request. If you want to perform a review write a comment saying: @ansys-reviewer-bot review |
Member
|
@SMoraisAnsys Should we merge this? It is a duplicate user @kbhagat-ansys and @kbhagat2 |
SMoraisAnsys
requested changes
Jun 30, 2025
Collaborator
SMoraisAnsys
left a comment
SMoraisAnsys
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There seem to be a loop in the way this PR are generated. I've opened an issue on that problem, let's wait for the final decision to be taken in order to avoid having this kind of PR opened every week.
Collaborator
I don't see any issue with having both accounts but we need to have a final decision. This PRs have been opened quite a few times, see #6218 and #6295 |
Contributor
|
Please Ignore “kbhagat2” that was in error.
I use “kbhagat-ansys” for work purposes.
…On Mon, Jun 30, 2025 at 03:42 Sébastien Morais ***@***.***> wrote:
*SMoraisAnsys* left a comment (ansys/pyaedt#6330)
<#6330 (comment)>
@SMoraisAnsys <https://github.com/SMoraisAnsys> Should we merge this? It
is a duplicate user @kbhagat-ansys <https://github.com/kbhagat-ansys> and
@kbhagat2 <https://github.com/kbhagat2>
I don't see any issue with having both accounts but we need to have a
final decision. This PRs have been opened quite a few times, see #6218
<#6218> and #6295
<#6295>
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#6330 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB3WS2RT34RSIL7Q7VDOEZ33GDS57AVCNFSM6AAAAACAMUBPNKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZTAMJYGEZDOMBQGA>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Updated the
CONTRIBUTORS.mdfile with the latest contributors.This pull request was created by a bot. If you have any questions, please ping the PyAnsys Core team for assistance. To ping the team write a comment in this issue with the following mention:
@ansys/pyansys-core.If you want this repository to be excluded from this automated maintenance process, please let us know by filling in the opt-out request form.