Skip to content

fix: backticks breaking doc build after ruff linter#1275

Merged
RobPasMue merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
fix/docs-backticks
Jun 20, 2024
Merged

fix: backticks breaking doc build after ruff linter#1275
RobPasMue merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
fix/docs-backticks

Conversation

@RobPasMue
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

As title says

@RobPasMue RobPasMue self-assigned this Jun 20, 2024
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the bug Something isn't working label Jun 20, 2024
@RobPasMue RobPasMue changed the title fix: backticks braking doc build after ruff linter fix: backticks breaking doc build after ruff linter Jun 20, 2024
@RobPasMue RobPasMue marked this pull request as ready for review June 20, 2024 13:12
@RobPasMue RobPasMue requested a review from a team as a code owner June 20, 2024 13:12
@RobPasMue
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Docs were currently broken due to this - merging since blocking

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Jun 20, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.07%. Comparing base (b3d4f5d) to head (65b10a6).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1275   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.07%   92.07%           
=======================================
  Files          85       85           
  Lines        6598     6598           
=======================================
  Hits         6075     6075           
  Misses        523      523           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@RobPasMue RobPasMue merged commit 6fc9054 into main Jun 20, 2024
@RobPasMue RobPasMue deleted the fix/docs-backticks branch June 20, 2024 13:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants