Skip to content

fix: tech review fixes for blitz branch#1703

Merged
RobPasMue merged 14 commits into
blitzfrom
fix/blitz-issues
Jan 29, 2025
Merged

fix: tech review fixes for blitz branch#1703
RobPasMue merged 14 commits into
blitzfrom
fix/blitz-issues

Conversation

@RobPasMue

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

After technical review of the blitz branch, we are addressing the various comments here.

Issue linked

None

@RobPasMue RobPasMue self-assigned this Jan 29, 2025
@github-actions github-actions Bot added testing Anything related to tests bug Something isn't working labels Jan 29, 2025
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jan 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.02%. Comparing base (6b1622a) to head (efc83be).
Report is 1 commits behind head on blitz.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##            blitz    #1703   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.02%   91.02%           
=======================================
  Files          91       91           
  Lines        7959     8004   +45     
=======================================
+ Hits         7245     7286   +41     
- Misses        714      718    +4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@RobPasMue RobPasMue marked this pull request as ready for review January 29, 2025 14:36
@RobPasMue RobPasMue requested review from a team and PipKat as code owners January 29, 2025 14:36
@RobPasMue RobPasMue enabled auto-merge (squash) January 29, 2025 15:02
@RobPasMue RobPasMue merged commit 4a9dc2d into blitz Jan 29, 2025
@RobPasMue RobPasMue deleted the fix/blitz-issues branch January 29, 2025 15:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working testing Anything related to tests

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants