feat: component name setting

[jacobrkerstetter]

Description

• Added the ability to set a component name via setter (ie. component.name = "name")
• Tested on design and component objects

Issue linked

Checklist

• I have tested my changes locally.
• I have added necessary documentation or updated existing documentation.
• I have followed the coding style guidelines of this project.
• I have added appropriate unit tests.
• I have reviewed my changes before submitting this pull request.
• I have linked the issue or issues that are solved to the PR if any.
• I have assigned this PR to myself.
• I have added the minimum version decorator to any new backend method implemented.
• I have made sure that the title of my PR follows Conventional commits style (e.g. feat: extrude circle to cylinder)

[jonahrb]

@jacobrkerstetter should this call rename_object() so that the client and server names are matching?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.75%. Comparing base (ce21ad6) to head (ce73403).
Report is 1 commits behind head on blitz.

❌ Your project status has failed because the head coverage (88.75%) is below the target coverage (90.00%). You can increase the head coverage or adjust the target coverage.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            blitz    #1820      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   88.74%   88.75%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          92       92              
  Lines        8593     8603      +10     
==========================================
+ Hits         7626     7636      +10     
  Misses        967      967              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[RobPasMue]

One minor comment - thanks @jacobrkerstetter!

[RobPasMue]

You might need to bump the API package version too, right? 0.4.47 if I am not mistaken