feat: repair tools refactoring

[umutsoysalansys]

Description

Refactoring repair tools to move repair stubs to the central area. See the issue for more details.

Issue linked

#1817

Checklist

• I have tested my changes locally.
• I have added necessary documentation or updated existing documentation.
• I have followed the coding style guidelines of this project.
• I have added appropriate unit tests.
• I have reviewed my changes before submitting this pull request.
• I have linked the issue or issues that are solved to the PR if any.
• I have assigned this PR to myself.
• I have added the minimum version decorator to any new backend method implemented.
• I have made sure that the title of my PR follows Conventional commits style (e.g. feat: extrude circle to cylinder)

[RobPasMue]

Looking great @umutsoysalansys - just left a few comments. The main one is related to the "DoubleValue". The rest are mostly formatting and docstring suggestions which you can just add and commit =) thanks a lot!! Once comments are resolved, I will approve again and merge.

[umutsoysalansys]

@RobPasMue what is the doc error, can we make these things more descriptive? Which py file lines are corresponding to the rst file lines? I can't see

[RobPasMue]

@RobPasMue what is the doc error, can we make these things more descriptive? Which py file lines are corresponding to the rst file lines? I can't see

I wish we could -- that's just Sphinx and other tools complaining... Nonetheless, the problem is still the docstring I referred to in this comment #1912 (comment)

I would remove the docstring if possible -- the other option is to format it properly based on the comments you are getting, but I know it is a painful process because you have a non-standard docstring

[RobPasMue]

LGTM!