refactor: using Python client library instead

[germa89]

Description

As the title.

Issue linked

ansys/pyansys#824

Checklist

• I have visited and read Develop PyMAPDL.
• I have tested my changes locally
• I have added necessary documentation or updated existing documentation.
• I have followed the PyMAPDL coding style guidelines.
• I have added appropriate unit tests that also ensure the minimal coverage criteria.
• I have reviewed my changes before submitting this pull request.
• I have linked the issue or issues that are solved to the PR if any.
• I have assigned this PR to myself.
• I have marked this PR as draft if it is not ready to be reviewed yet.
• I have made sure that the title of my PR follows Commit naming conventions (e.g. feat: adding new MAPDL command)

[ansys-reviewer-bot]

Thanks for opening a Pull Request. If you want to perform a review write a comment saying:

@ansys-reviewer-bot review

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.35%. Comparing base (04e9500) to head (48bec3c).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3797      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.41%   88.35%   -0.07%     
==========================================
  Files         187      187              
  Lines       14742    14742              
==========================================
- Hits        13034    13025       -9     
- Misses       1708     1717       +9     

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.