Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

List组件中每次grid属性中设置gutter后都会在水平方向出现滚动条,希望能够配置不出现滚动条 #8799

Closed
hitobear opened this issue Jan 3, 2018 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@hitobear
Copy link

@hitobear hitobear commented Jan 3, 2018

Reproduction

The reproduction' link is https://codesandbox.io/s/o5q1z4wv89

image

What problem does this feature solve?

使用List列表时关于滚动条的界面美观

What does the proposed API look like?

如添加scroll属性,可以为false或true

@ant-design-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@ant-design-bot ant-design-bot commented Jan 3, 2018

It will be better to write your issue/comment in English, so more people can understand you.
And this means that more people can help you or benefit from your issue/comment.
See: #4897

@ant-design-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@ant-design-bot ant-design-bot commented Jan 3, 2018

Hello @hitobear. Please provide a online reproduction by forking this link https://u.ant.design/codesandbox-repro. Issues labeled by Need Reproduce will be closed if no activities in 7 days.

@ant-design-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@ant-design-bot ant-design-bot commented Jan 3, 2018

Hello @hitobear. Please provide a online reproduction by forking this link https://u.ant.design/codesandbox-repro. Issues labeled by Need Reproduce will be closed if no activities in 7 days.

nikogu added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 4, 2018
afc163 added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 7, 2018
@afc163 afc163 closed this Jan 7, 2018
afc163 added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 9, 2018
close #8799

change a better way to fix #8602
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
5 participants