Separate listening and access port #9
I our deployment, Sish listens on port 443, but it is behind a firewall that does a PAT on port 30443.
I think this is useful, but my intentions for that message wasn't to describe what ports can be accessed, but instead to report the ports on the backend side of the SSH connection that can be accessed. Maybe it would be more worthwhile to make the message more explicit? Something like:
What're your thoughts on this, do you think it would suffice? Feel free to hop on IRC to chat about it too.