Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Relicensing to MIT #100

Closed
antonioribeiro opened this issue Mar 14, 2018 · 20 comments
Closed

Relicensing to MIT #100

antonioribeiro opened this issue Mar 14, 2018 · 20 comments

Comments

@antonioribeiro
Copy link
Owner

@antonioribeiro antonioribeiro commented Mar 14, 2018

Dear contributors,

To allow this package to be adopted by other projects, I'm trying to move the license of this package from the original GPLv3 to something more permissive, like MIT, but I need you and the original developer (Phil), to approve it.

So, I'm listing all of you (up to today) and ask for a YAY/NAY comment in this thread, from each one of you.

If you have any questions or something to say about this change, please do.

If you have a really good understanding of licensing (which I do not), please jump in and help us.

@barryvdh
Copy link
Contributor

@barryvdh barryvdh commented Mar 14, 2018

Yay

@SebastianS90
Copy link
Contributor

@SebastianS90 SebastianS90 commented Mar 14, 2018

Fine for me!

@domodwyer
Copy link
Contributor

@domodwyer domodwyer commented Mar 14, 2018

Absolutely!

@it-can
Copy link
Contributor

@it-can it-can commented Mar 14, 2018

Yup

@antonioribeiro
Copy link
Owner Author

@antonioribeiro antonioribeiro commented Mar 14, 2018

Just got Phil's blessing

image

@adeelx
Copy link
Contributor

@adeelx adeelx commented Mar 14, 2018

Yay

3 similar comments
@drbyte
Copy link
Contributor

@drbyte drbyte commented Mar 14, 2018

Yay

@ngyikp
Copy link
Contributor

@ngyikp ngyikp commented Mar 15, 2018

Yay

@tshafer
Copy link
Contributor

@tshafer tshafer commented Mar 15, 2018

Yay

@taichunmin
Copy link
Contributor

@taichunmin taichunmin commented Mar 15, 2018

YAY

1 similar comment
@proshanto
Copy link
Contributor

@proshanto proshanto commented Mar 15, 2018

@mikerockett
Copy link
Contributor

@mikerockett mikerockett commented Mar 15, 2018

Couldn't agree more! 👍

@ashnewmanjones
Copy link

@ashnewmanjones ashnewmanjones commented Mar 15, 2018

YAY

@jbrooksuk
Copy link
Contributor

@jbrooksuk jbrooksuk commented Mar 15, 2018

Sure!

@antonioribeiro
Copy link
Owner Author

@antonioribeiro antonioribeiro commented Mar 15, 2018

Yes!

@leandro-lugaresi
Copy link
Contributor

@leandro-lugaresi leandro-lugaresi commented Mar 15, 2018

YAY

@antonioribeiro
Copy link
Owner Author

@antonioribeiro antonioribeiro commented Mar 15, 2018

We need at least 95% of all contributors/contributions to make this change, but we have only, so if @GrahamCampbell gives us his AYE, we should be good to go:

image

@aik099
Copy link
Contributor

@aik099 aik099 commented Mar 15, 2018

Yes.

@GrahamCampbell
Copy link
Contributor

@GrahamCampbell GrahamCampbell commented Mar 15, 2018

Do whatever you want. I don't mind. :)

@antonioribeiro
Copy link
Owner Author

@antonioribeiro antonioribeiro commented Mar 15, 2018

With 98%+ of contributions/contributors, I'm considering this proposal as approved, but still hoping to reach 100%.

image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet