Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ARROW-9259: [Format] Add language indicating that unsigned dictionary indices are supported but that signed integers are preferred #7567

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

wesm
Copy link
Member

@wesm wesm commented Jun 28, 2020

This does not alter the format metadata in any way but has implications for the reference implementations (e.g. C++ currently rejects unsigned integer indices).

@github-actions
Copy link

@wesm wesm changed the title ARROW-9259: [Format][DONOTMERGE] Add language indicating that unsigned dictionary indices are supported but that signed integers are preferred ARROW-9259: [Format] Add language indicating that unsigned dictionary indices are supported but that signed integers are preferred Jul 2, 2020
@wesm
Copy link
Member Author

wesm commented Jul 2, 2020

@wesm wesm closed this in a6e90de Jul 2, 2020
@wesm wesm deleted the format-unsigned-dict-indices branch July 2, 2020 22:49
sgnkc pushed a commit to sgnkc/arrow that referenced this pull request Jul 6, 2020
… indices are supported but that signed integers are preferred

This does not alter the format metadata in any way but has implications for the reference implementations (e.g. C++ currently rejects unsigned integer indices).

Closes apache#7567 from wesm/format-unsigned-dict-indices

Authored-by: Wes McKinney <wesm@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Wes McKinney <wesm@apache.org>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant