-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 344
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
remove spring boot support #534
Comments
The uber jar could cause some trouble for us to some application level change release, but I'm not sure if the Java main runtime can handle the Dependency injection job well. |
What if you do not package the spring boot as an fat-jar, but let it be a set of JARs on the classpath. Would that work better for SB. However SB is a bit heavy by itself for the serverless world, but surely Pivotal is moving in that direction too, to slim down SB |
This is what I already did however it is not so easy to support multiple version of camel with multiple version of sb.
The other point is that having sb do not bring much value here
On Sat, 9 Mar 2019 at 11:27, Claus Ibsen ***@***.***> wrote:
What if you do not package the spring boot as an fat-jar, but let it be a
set of JARs on the classpath. Would that work better for SB.
However SB is a bit heavy by itself for the serverless world, but surely
Pivotal is moving in that direction too, to slim down SB
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#534 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AByEhfK5I9V4XlHzv66GKejXX8Gqrxopks5vU4yPgaJpZM4biGxr>
.
--
--
Luca Burgazzoli
|
Some time ago I've introduced support for Spring Boot but it is very hard to keep it at the same level of the Java main runtime as:
I do propose to deprecate spring boot support and remove it before 1.0
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: