Skip to content

Conversation

@ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Nov 26, 2014

CB-8079 use application package name instead of activity package name, because the application package name could be different from the activity package name

…, because the application package name could be different from the activity package name
@ghost ghost changed the title CB-8079 use application package name instead of activity package name, b... CB-8079 use application package name instead of activity package name, because the application package name could be different from the activity package name Nov 26, 2014
Daniel Toplak added 2 commits December 1, 2014 11:02
The old behavior uses the activity class package name.
The fallback uses the application package name, when the resource is not found.
@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Dec 1, 2014

This is obsolete

@ghost ghost closed this Dec 1, 2014
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants