Skip to content

Conversation

@jimexist
Copy link
Member

Which issue does this PR close?

Closes #.

Rationale for this change

Impl ops::Not for expr to make it more generic

What changes are included in this PR?

Are there any user-facing changes?

@jimexist jimexist marked this pull request as draft July 21, 2021 12:50
Copy link
Contributor

@alamb alamb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this one looks good -- it seems to have gotten lost in the shuffle / list of PRs. Sorry about that @jimexist

($TYPE:ty, $SCALAR:ident) => {
#[allow(missing_docs)]
($TYPE:ty, $SCALAR:ident, $DOC: expr) => {
#[doc = $DOC]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

use datafusion::arrow::datatypes::DataType;
use datafusion::logical_plan;
use pyo3::{prelude::*, wrap_pyfunction};
use pyo3::{prelude::*, types::PyTuple, wrap_pyfunction};
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are the changes to python intended for this PR @jimexist ?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not really, let me rebase.

@jimexist jimexist marked this pull request as ready for review August 22, 2021 15:38
@alamb alamb merged commit c636d35 into apache:master Aug 23, 2021
@jimexist jimexist deleted the impl-not branch August 23, 2021 14:28
@houqp houqp added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 6, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants