[Fix-8389][Common] Fix oshi compatibility issues cause it fail to boot on m1 mac

[ronyang1985]

Purpose of the pull request

fix #8389

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #8390 (55684f4) into dev (68ad22b) will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 77.77%.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##                dev    #8390      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     45.36%   45.35%   -0.02%     
- Complexity     3993     4026      +33     
============================================
  Files           680      686       +6     
  Lines         26417    26709     +292     
  Branches       2839     2868      +29     
============================================
+ Hits          11985    12114     +129     
- Misses        13299    13450     +151     
- Partials       1133     1145      +12     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
.../apache/dolphinscheduler/common/utils/OSUtils.java	17.21% <77.77%> (+3.32%)	⬆️
...r/service/queue/PeerTaskInstancePriorityQueue.java	68.00% <0.00%> (-5.92%)	⬇️
...e/dolphinscheduler/remote/NettyRemotingClient.java	50.70% <0.00%> (-2.12%)	⬇️
...er/api/service/impl/TaskDefinitionServiceImpl.java	23.18% <0.00%> (-0.12%)	⬇️
.../org/apache/dolphinscheduler/api/enums/Status.java	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...dolphinscheduler/service/k8s/K8sClientService.java	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...uler/api/service/impl/K8sNameSpaceServiceImpl.java	78.90% <0.00%> (ø)
...va/org/apache/dolphinscheduler/dao/entity/K8s.java	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...ache/dolphinscheduler/dao/entity/K8sNamespace.java	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...heduler/api/controller/K8sNamespaceController.java	71.42% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 2 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 68ad22b...55684f4. Read the comment docs.

[zhongjiajie]

@ronyang1985 Is it ready to go now?

[ronyang1985]

@zhongjiajie
I made some change, and sleep is not required now.
Let's continue

[ruanwenjun]

LGTM

[sonarqubecloud]

SonarCloud Quality Gate failed.   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
2 Code Smells

30.3% Coverage
4.2% Duplication

[zhongjiajie]

Thanks @ruanwenjun reviewing, I am not sure about the License PTAL @CalvinKirs

[zhongjiajie]

If the License is good, we could merge to it

[CalvinKirs]

Well done. License good.

[zhongjiajie]

LGTM, thanks @ronyang1985