Skip to content

branch-4.1: [fix](mv) Avoid unioning query-unused MV partitions #63081#63706

Merged
yiguolei merged 1 commit into
branch-4.1from
auto-pick-63081-branch-4.1
May 27, 2026
Merged

branch-4.1: [fix](mv) Avoid unioning query-unused MV partitions #63081#63706
yiguolei merged 1 commit into
branch-4.1from
auto-pick-63081-branch-4.1

Conversation

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Cherry-picked from #63081

Problem Summary:

In MV union rewrite, rewrittenPlanUsePartitionNameSet may contain extra
MV partitions outside the query range. For example, the query only uses
{p20260401, p20260402, p20260403}, but the rewritten MV scan may select
partitions from p20260301 to p20260428. The old compensation logic
mapped all removed MV partitions back to base table partitions and added
them into baseTableNeedUnionPartitionNameSet. This created unnecessary
base table union branches, increased the MV candidate cost, and could
make explain show MaterializedViewRewriteSuccessButNotChose.

---------

Co-authored-by: yangtao555 <yangtao555@jd.com>
@github-actions github-actions Bot requested a review from yiguolei as a code owner May 27, 2026 02:05
@hello-stephen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

run buildall

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

FE Regression Coverage Report

Increment line coverage 5.41% (2/37) 🎉
Increment coverage report
Complete coverage report

@yiguolei yiguolei merged commit 954f120 into branch-4.1 May 27, 2026
29 of 32 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants