[FLINK-39731][table] Port from Calcite fix for SqlValidatorImpl should reject MATCH_RECOGNIZE with duplicate MEASURE#28227
Merged
Conversation
…uld reject `MATCH_RECOGNIZE` with duplicate `MEASURE`
snuyanzin
commented
May 22, 2026
| final String alias = SqlValidatorUtil.alias(measure, aliases.size()); | ||
| aliases.add(alias); | ||
|
|
||
| if (!aliases.add(alias)) { |
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
port from apache/calcite@16c2b1c
Porting of CalciteResource is overkill, so for now just hardcoded message in exception.
Will be replaced with Calcite upgrade
Collaborator
github-actions
Bot
added
the
community-reviewed
Contributor
Author
|
thanks for taking a look? |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What is the purpose of the change
The PR ports fix from Calcite for MATCH_RECOGNIZE validation
Brief change log
SqlValidatorImpl
Verifying this change
Test also provided
Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
@Public(Evolving): (no)Documentation
Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?