[FLINK-12756][hive] migrate HiveCatalog from TypeInformation-based old type system to DataType-based new type system

[bowenli86]

What is the purpose of the change

This PR migrates HiveCatalog from TypeInformation-based old type system to DataType-based new type system

Note: hive table InputFormat and OutputFormat may also need to migrate similarly. This PR doesn't contain those changes.

Brief change log

• migrated HiveCatalog from TypeInformation-based old type system to DataType-based new type system
• updated unit tests

Verifying this change

This change is already covered by existing test

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

• Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (no)
• The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with @Public(Evolving): (no)
• The serializers: (no)
• The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): (no)
• Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its components), Checkpointing, Yarn/Mesos, ZooKeeper: (no)
• The S3 file system connector: (no)

Documentation

• Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (no)
• If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable)

[bowenli86]

cc @xuefuz @lirui-apache @zjuwangg

[flinkbot]

Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community
to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review.

Review Progress

• ❓ 1. The [description] looks good.
• ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink.
• ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from.
• ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture].
• ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good.

Please see the Pull Request Review Guide for a full explanation of the review process.

The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required

Bot commands

The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:

• @flinkbot approve description to approve one or more aspects (aspects: description, consensus, architecture and quality)
• @flinkbot approve all to approve all aspects
• @flinkbot approve-until architecture to approve everything until architecture
• @flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..] to require somebody's attention
• @flinkbot disapprove architecture to remove an approval you gave earlier

[xuefuz]

It appears to me this builder isn't seem necessary or proper as the constructor does the same thing and probably in a more complete fashion.

[bowenli86]

the builder is already there, and is not introduced by this PR. I feel it’s good to have this method to allow users batch loading elements with builder, which is required by this PR.

I think whether exposing the class constructor as public is orthogonal

[xuefuz]

I meant this builder method is new! However, I didn't realize the constructor is private. With that, it's fine to have this.

[xuefuz]

PR looks mostly good to me except the introduced builder.

[bowenli86]

Thanks @xuefuz for your review.

Merging

[bowenli86]

Rebased to master before merged