diff --git a/website/docs/sql_queries.md b/website/docs/sql_queries.md
index 9310c72fbc624..961283215d8db 100644
--- a/website/docs/sql_queries.md
+++ b/website/docs/sql_queries.md
@@ -316,6 +316,10 @@ FROM hudi_table_changes(
 )
 ```
 
+:::note
+Incremental queries are currently not supported for Merge-on-Read (MoR) tables with partial updates.
+:::
+
 :::info Incremental vs CDC Queries
 Incremental queries offer even better query efficiency than even the CDC queries above, since they amortize the cost of compactions across your data lake.
 For e.g the table has received 10 million modifications across 1 million records over a time window, incremental queries can fetch the latest value for
diff --git a/website/versioned_docs/version-1.0.0/sql_queries.md b/website/versioned_docs/version-1.0.0/sql_queries.md
index aca0a0ac8cccb..7b7c26122e031 100644
--- a/website/versioned_docs/version-1.0.0/sql_queries.md
+++ b/website/versioned_docs/version-1.0.0/sql_queries.md
@@ -316,6 +316,10 @@ FROM hudi_table_changes(
 )
 ```
 
+:::note
+Incremental queries are currently not supported for Merge-On-Read (MOR) tables with partial updates.
+:::
+
 :::info Incremental vs CDC Queries
 Incremental queries offer even better query efficiency than even the CDC queries above, since they amortize the cost of compactions across your data lake.
 For e.g the table has received 10 million modifications across 1 million records over a time window, incremental queries can fetch the latest value for
diff --git a/website/versioned_docs/version-1.0.1/sql_queries.md b/website/versioned_docs/version-1.0.1/sql_queries.md
index aca0a0ac8cccb..7b7c26122e031 100644
--- a/website/versioned_docs/version-1.0.1/sql_queries.md
+++ b/website/versioned_docs/version-1.0.1/sql_queries.md
@@ -316,6 +316,10 @@ FROM hudi_table_changes(
 )
 ```
 
+:::note
+Incremental queries are currently not supported for Merge-On-Read (MOR) tables with partial updates.
+:::
+
 :::info Incremental vs CDC Queries
 Incremental queries offer even better query efficiency than even the CDC queries above, since they amortize the cost of compactions across your data lake.
 For e.g the table has received 10 million modifications across 1 million records over a time window, incremental queries can fetch the latest value for
diff --git a/website/versioned_docs/version-1.0.2/sql_queries.md b/website/versioned_docs/version-1.0.2/sql_queries.md
index f00bee112179a..e5a9c0b1112d3 100644
--- a/website/versioned_docs/version-1.0.2/sql_queries.md
+++ b/website/versioned_docs/version-1.0.2/sql_queries.md
@@ -316,6 +316,10 @@ FROM hudi_table_changes(
 )
 ```
 
+:::note
+Incremental queries are currently not supported for Merge-On-Read (MOR) tables with partial updates.
+:::
+
 :::info Incremental vs CDC Queries
 Incremental queries offer even better query efficiency than even the CDC queries above, since they amortize the cost of compactions across your data lake.
 For e.g the table has received 10 million modifications across 1 million records over a time window, incremental queries can fetch the latest value for
diff --git a/website/versioned_docs/version-1.1.1/sql_queries.md b/website/versioned_docs/version-1.1.1/sql_queries.md
index 9310c72fbc624..81ce6f0b49a22 100644
--- a/website/versioned_docs/version-1.1.1/sql_queries.md
+++ b/website/versioned_docs/version-1.1.1/sql_queries.md
@@ -316,6 +316,10 @@ FROM hudi_table_changes(
 )
 ```
 
+:::note
+Incremental queries are currently not supported for Merge-On-Read (MOR) tables with partial updates.
+:::
+
 :::info Incremental vs CDC Queries
 Incremental queries offer even better query efficiency than even the CDC queries above, since they amortize the cost of compactions across your data lake.
 For e.g the table has received 10 million modifications across 1 million records over a time window, incremental queries can fetch the latest value for