Skip to content

Conversation

@Xuanwo
Copy link
Member

@Xuanwo Xuanwo commented Dec 5, 2025

Which issue does this PR close?

What changes are included in this PR?

Are these changes tested?

Signed-off-by: Xuanwo <github@xuanwo.io>
Signed-off-by: Xuanwo <github@xuanwo.io>
Copy link
Collaborator

@mbutrovich mbutrovich left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense to me, thanks @Xuanwo!

@Xuanwo Xuanwo requested a review from liurenjie1024 December 8, 2025 07:03
Copy link
Contributor

@liurenjie1024 liurenjie1024 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is pr is fine as currently smol is not widely used, and it's the first step of making runtime independent. Just one minor nit to avoid breaking user.

@liurenjie1024 liurenjie1024 merged commit 84b2ba8 into main Dec 8, 2025
18 checks passed
@liurenjie1024 liurenjie1024 deleted the xuanwo/remove-smol-native branch December 8, 2025 10:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

ci: How about just dropping native smol support?

3 participants