Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Document usage of a security manager for remote tests #406

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Document usage of a security manager for remote tests #406

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

@FSchumacher
Copy link
Contributor

@FSchumacher FSchumacher commented Oct 13, 2018

Description

Remote tests can be secured even further, when running with enabled security manager.

Motivation and Context

Especially RMI has gained more attraction by attackers, so give users another tool to defend against attacks.

How Has This Been Tested?

A simple test plan has been run remotely with the documented steps. To be honest the documentation has been done after the tests. So it would be great if more people can follow the documentation and try their tests.

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

  • Documentation

Checklist:

  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
@codecov-io
Copy link

@codecov-io codecov-io commented Oct 13, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #406 into trunk will increase coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##              trunk     #406      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     58.58%   58.58%   +<.01%     
  Complexity    10616    10616              
============================================
  Files          1193     1193              
  Lines         75957    75957              
  Branches       7343     7343              
============================================
+ Hits          44499    44502       +3     
+ Misses        28953    28951       -2     
+ Partials       2505     2504       -1
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
...c/core/org/apache/jmeter/reporters/Summariser.java 85.49% <0%> (-0.77%) 18% <0%> (-1%)
...re/org/apache/jmeter/engine/DistributedRunner.java 85.71% <0%> (+3.36%) 32% <0%> (+1%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b15fab0...5514943. Read the comment docs.

@pmouawad
Copy link
Contributor

@pmouawad pmouawad commented Oct 21, 2018

+1
Thanks

@asfgit asfgit closed this in fb6bebb Oct 25, 2018
StorDm pushed a commit to etnetera/jmeter that referenced this issue Jan 7, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
3 participants