Skip to content

Add Chinese Simplified Translation for Open Model Thread Group #725

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 26, 2022

Conversation

kaola89
Copy link
Contributor

@kaola89 kaola89 commented Aug 17, 2022

Description

Add Chinese Simplified Translation for Open Model Thread Group

Motivation and Context

Add Chinese Simplified Translation for new component

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.

Add Chinese Simplified Translation for Open Model Thread Group
update word “模式” to “模型”
@vlsi vlsi merged commit c60c3ab into apache:master Sep 26, 2022
@vlsi
Copy link
Collaborator

vlsi commented Sep 26, 2022

@kaola89 , thanks for the contribution.

By the way, do you think it would make sense to make "schedule string" translatable?
E.g. what would be the proper Chinese for rate(3/sec) random_arrivals(1 min) rate(100/hour) random_arrivals(2 hour) rate(6/sec)?

@vlsi vlsi added this to the 5.5-next milestone Sep 26, 2022
@kaola89
Copy link
Contributor Author

kaola89 commented Sep 26, 2022

@kaola89 , thanks for the contribution.

By the way, do you think it would make sense to make "schedule string" translatable? E.g. what would be the proper Chinese for rate(3/sec) random_arrivals(1 min) rate(100/hour) random_arrivals(2 hour) rate(6/sec)?

@vlsi
yeah, I think local language will let user know their settings better. Do you have any plan to make them translatable? If need any support with Chinese, I would like to contribute with this.

Your case Chinsese like 速率(3/秒) 任意到达(1 分钟) 速率(100/小时) 任意到达(2 小时) 速率(6/秒)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants