Skip to content

Option to provision node with subnetwork#783

Closed
larsla wants to merge 7 commits intoapache:trunkfrom
larsla:gce_subnetworks
Closed

Option to provision node with subnetwork#783
larsla wants to merge 7 commits intoapache:trunkfrom
larsla:gce_subnetworks

Conversation

@larsla
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@larsla larsla commented May 10, 2016

Option to provision node with subnetwork

Description

This PR relates to #780, but adds the option to specify a subnetwork when creating a node.

Status

  • done, ready for review

Checklist (tick everything that applies)

  • Code linting (required, can be done after the PR checks)
  • Documentation
  • Tests
  • ICLA (required for bigger changes)

@erjohnso
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Holy moly @larsla - this is awesome timing and thank you! I was just starting my day by getting ready to do this myself, but now I can watch cat videos on youtube instead! 👍

Did you want to take a pass at adding tests for this? If not, I'm happy to do that (since I planned to do it anyway).

@larsla
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

larsla commented May 10, 2016

:)

I didn't have time to look at the tests yet, so please go ahead if you like.

@erjohnso
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Works for me. I'll work of your stuff.

@erjohnso
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@larsla - let me know if this works for you. If you're happy with it and get it added to your branch, could you squash your commits (fine to collapse mine too).

@erjohnso
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@larsla - if you're OK with these tests, I can go ahead and do the cleanup/merge.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 9639726 May 17, 2016
asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2016
Signed-off-by: Eric Johnson <erjohnso@google.com>
@erjohnso
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks again for this @larsla!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants