Navigation Menu

Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NIFI-3335: Add initial.maxvalue support to GenerateTableFetch #2039

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

mattyb149
Copy link
Contributor

Moved the common code back to the abstract base class

For all changes:

  • Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? Is it referenced
    in the commit message?

  • Does your PR title start with NIFI-XXXX where XXXX is the JIRA number you are trying to resolve? Pay particular attention to the hyphen "-" character.

  • Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target branch (typically master)?

  • Is your initial contribution a single, squashed commit?

For code changes:

  • Have you ensured that the full suite of tests is executed via mvn -Pcontrib-check clean install at the root nifi folder?
  • Have you written or updated unit tests to verify your changes?
  • If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under ASF 2.0?
  • If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE file, including the main LICENSE file under nifi-assembly?
  • If applicable, have you updated the NOTICE file, including the main NOTICE file found under nifi-assembly?
  • If adding new Properties, have you added .displayName in addition to .name (programmatic access) for each of the new properties?

For documentation related changes:

  • Have you ensured that format looks appropriate for the output in which it is rendered?

Note:

Please ensure that once the PR is submitted, you check travis-ci for build issues and submit an update to your PR as soon as possible.

Copy link
Contributor

@pvillard31 pvillard31 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @mattyb149, code LGTM, just left one comment.

@@ -198,6 +201,25 @@ public void onTrigger(final ProcessContext context, final ProcessSessionFactory
// set as the current state map (after the session has been committed)
final Map<String, String> statePropertyMap = new HashMap<>(stateMap.toMap());

// If an initial max value for column(s) has been specified using properties, and this column is not in the state manager, sync them to the state property map
final Map<String,String> maxValueProperties = getDefaultMaxValueProperties(context.getProperties());
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would it make sense to do it in the @OnScheduled method of the Abstract class? You could have the same code in common for QueryDatabaseTable and GenerateTableFetch. Besides not sure it needs to be done each time the processor is triggered? Thoughts?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah that's a better idea, should've been done in the original PR but I missed it during my review and just cut-pasted it back to the abstract class to share.
I won't be able to move all that common code block as it needs the table name which can come from a flow file. But I can call getDefaultMaxValueProperties() at schedule-time vs trigger time.

Copy link
Contributor

@pvillard31 pvillard31 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1, squashing and merging to master, thanks @mattyb149

@asfgit asfgit closed this in dc4006f Jul 27, 2017
pvillard31 pushed a commit to pvillard31/nifi that referenced this pull request Jan 3, 2019
Signed-off-by: Pierre Villard <pierre.villard.fr@gmail.com>

This closes apache#2039.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
2 participants