-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
This issue was moved to a discussion.
You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
websocket feature parity #2678
Comments
feature parity would indeed be pretty awesome and would imho help adoption further |
for latest state see: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/wiki/Client-Features-Matrix |
imho websocket is for pulsar something like "the window to the web world". It enables usage of pulsar for fields like web-tracking, live chat and many more... Of course recourses are limited and not all fields have the same importance for adoption of pulsar.
are important for everyone thinking about using pulsar with websocket.. |
This issue was moved to a discussion.
You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →
Is there a roadmap that discusses websocket features? It looks like websockets is pretty far behind in feature parity.
I'm considering moving from kafka to pulsar but topics regex consumer is an important feature for me.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: