Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

websocket feature parity #2678

Closed
sfescape opened this issue Sep 29, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

websocket feature parity #2678

sfescape opened this issue Sep 29, 2018 · 3 comments
Labels
area/websocket lifecycle/stale type/feature The PR added a new feature or issue requested a new feature

Comments

@sfescape
Copy link

Is there a roadmap that discusses websocket features? It looks like websockets is pretty far behind in feature parity.
I'm considering moving from kafka to pulsar but topics regex consumer is an important feature for me.

@hpvd
Copy link

hpvd commented Nov 19, 2020

feature parity would indeed be pretty awesome and would imho help adoption further

@hpvd
Copy link

hpvd commented Nov 19, 2020

@hpvd
Copy link

hpvd commented Nov 24, 2020

imho websocket is for pulsar something like "the window to the web world". It enables usage of pulsar for fields like web-tracking, live chat and many more...
If one see the potential of this community, one should give websocket bugs and feature-requests a fair priority in the next releases
While writing this there are roughly 25 issues open regarding websocket topics.
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+websocket+
3 includes open pull request which may be easy to close.

Of course recourses are limited and not all fields have the same importance for adoption of pulsar.
But at least the points

are important for everyone thinking about using pulsar with websocket..

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
area/websocket lifecycle/stale type/feature The PR added a new feature or issue requested a new feature
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants