Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Request/Reply model supporting for microservice scenario #208

Closed
xiangwangcheng opened this issue Dec 20, 2019 · 0 comments
Closed

Request/Reply model supporting for microservice scenario #208

xiangwangcheng opened this issue Dec 20, 2019 · 0 comments
Labels
feature
Milestone
2.1.0

Comments

@xiangwangcheng
Copy link

FEATURE REQUEST

  1. Please describe the feature you are requesting.
    RocketMQ-Spring need support RPC(request/response model) since RMQ has supported it since version 4.6.0

  2. Provide any additional detail on your proposed use case for this feature.

  3. Indicate the importance of this issue to you (blocker, must-have, should-have, nice-to-have). Are you currently using any workarounds to address this issue?
@xiangwangcheng xiangwangcheng mentioned this issue Dec 20, 2019
Merged
1 task
@vongosling vongosling changed the title Need support RPC(request/response model) Request/Reply model supporting for microservice scenario Dec 25, 2019
@RongtongJin RongtongJin added this to the 2.1.0 milestone Jan 8, 2020
vongosling pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 15, 2020
@vongosling
[ISSUE #208]support request/reply model in rocketmq-spring (#209)
64f149b 
* support request/response model in rocketmq-spring

* fix checkstyle problem

* add more test cases

* optimize request/reply model

* add examples to ProduceApplication.java

* wrap RequestCallback to conceal RocketMQ message

* requestCallback as method parameter

* delete useless class

* fix some comments and print format
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
feature
Projects
None yet
Milestone
2.1.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@xiangwangcheng @RongtongJin