Should we expect a subgraph to have multiple "entities" as a common approach?

[longility]

The demo shows an example of 1 subgraph - 1 entity, which is more "pure" microservice. However, I think that 1 subgraph - many entities (more "monolith") may be a common scenario. I see it as an incremental and pragmatic approach to development where we can defer splitting up the subgraph to more subgraphs, which may not necessarily be 1 subgraph - 1 entity as well. I don't know if the lib will conveniently allow that or not.

Should we expect a subgraph to have multiple "entities" as a common approach? If so, should we consider that part of the demo?

/cc @prasek

[prasek]

@longility yes that's a good point. the demo was intended to keep things as simple as possible, but that would be good to mention and perhaps include in the demo. /cc @michael-watson