Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner. It is now read-only.

Need an abstraction layer for accessing calendar data. #452

Closed
macosforgebot opened this issue Apr 25, 2008 · 6 comments
Closed

Need an abstraction layer for accessing calendar data. #452

macosforgebot opened this issue Apr 25, 2008 · 6 comments

Comments

@macosforgebot
Copy link

@macosforgebot macosforgebot commented Apr 25, 2008

@dreid originally submitted this as ticket:269


Currently the CalDAV protocol implementation is very intertwined with our file system datastore. An abstraction layer for dealing with calendar data would let us easily trade the file system datastore for something more scalable or performant. Not to mention make everything easier to test by being able to use an in memory datastore.

@macosforgebot
Copy link
Author

@macosforgebot macosforgebot commented Apr 29, 2009

@wsanchez originally submitted this as comment:1:⁠ticket:269

  • Milestone set to CalendarServer-2.2
@macosforgebot
Copy link
Author

@macosforgebot macosforgebot commented Apr 29, 2009

@wsanchez originally submitted this as comment:2:⁠ticket:269

  • Milestone changed from CalendarServer-2.2 to CalendarServer-2.x
@macosforgebot
Copy link
Author

@macosforgebot macosforgebot commented Oct 26, 2009

@wsanchez originally submitted this as comment:3:⁠ticket:269

  • Owner changed from @wsanchez to @glyph
  • Milestone changed from CalendarServer-2.x to CalendarServer-3.x
@macosforgebot
Copy link
Author

@macosforgebot macosforgebot commented Feb 25, 2010

@wsanchez originally submitted this as comment:4:⁠ticket:269


txcaldav.icalendarserver and txcarddav.iaddressbookstore and the beginnings of this.

@macosforgebot
Copy link
Author

@macosforgebot macosforgebot commented Feb 25, 2010

@wsanchez originally submitted this as comment:5:⁠ticket:269


Dup of #⁠132

@macosforgebot
Copy link
Author

@macosforgebot macosforgebot commented Feb 25, 2010

@wsanchez originally submitted this as comment:6:⁠ticket:269

  • Status changed from new to closed
  • Resolution changed from to Duplicate
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
1 participant
You can’t perform that action at this time.