Skip to content

Supported versions #369

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 8 commits into from
May 16, 2019
Merged

Supported versions #369

merged 8 commits into from
May 16, 2019

Conversation

@sleto-it
Copy link
Contributor

@sleto-it sleto-it commented Apr 3, 2019 •
edited
Loading

Fixes:

  • bare metal 1.10 is production ready

Other:

  • adds entries for 1.11, 1.12, 1.13 and 1.14 for bare metals
  • adds IBM Cloud
  • adds operator version

Next steps (for later):

  • the table should be part of the official doc - a link can be included in the repo readme and the actual content moved to doc/ for integration into the official manual
  • we should reconsider 3.3.13 imho, and add a later version instead
  • additional break down (new matrix) by Operator component
  • add additional details on the environment used for the test, in particular wrt, per Joerg feedback

Thanks,

@sleto-it sleto-it changed the title Supported version Supported versions Apr 3, 2019
@sleto-it sleto-it requested review from lservini and neunhoef April 3, 2019 19:44
joerg84
joerg84 approved these changes Apr 4, 2019
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@joerg84 joerg84 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, I just have two questions :-)
a) We only mention the ArangoDB version, I would assume the Operator version is independent? Not sure what will be more meaningful for users...
b) should we also document the tested environment in a bit more detail, in particular regarding storage?

@joerg84
Copy link
Contributor

joerg84 commented Apr 4, 2019

Also, should we document a tested upgrade matrix (independent of this PR)?

@sleto-it sleto-it added the 9 WIP label Apr 5, 2019
@joerg84
Copy link
Contributor

joerg84 commented May 6, 2019

@sleto-it Just curious what is the status here?

@sleto-it
Copy link
Contributor Author

sleto-it commented May 13, 2019

@joerg84 joerg when we can have a call?

@joerg84
Copy link
Contributor

joerg84 commented May 13, 2019

@sleto-it Pinged you on slack

neunhoef
neunhoef approved these changes May 16, 2019
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@neunhoef neunhoef left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@neunhoef neunhoef merged commit b8203c2 into master May 16, 2019
@neunhoef neunhoef deleted the documentation/supported-version branch May 16, 2019 13:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@neunhoef neunhoef neunhoef approved these changes

@lservini lservini Awaiting requested review from lservini

+1 more reviewer

@joerg84 joerg84 joerg84 approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

3 Documentation 9 Ready to Merge

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@sleto-it @joerg84 @neunhoef