Skip to content

HTTPS clone URL

Subversion checkout URL

You can clone with HTTPS or Subversion.

Download ZIP
Lightweight benchmarking framework for Erlang.
branch: master

This branch is 23 commits ahead of Spawnfest2012:master

Fetching latest commit…

Cannot retrieve the latest commit at this time

Failed to load latest commit information.
examples/bench0
include
src
.gitignore
LICENSE
README.md
rebar
rebar.config

README.md

emark

Lightweight benchmarking framework for Erlang.

It is a plugin for rebar which benchmarks your code.

What it looks like

==> bench0 (emark)
calc_something/0    20000   38.1 µs/op
parse_omg_wtf/1 500000  1.6 µs/op

benchmark                      old µs/op new µs/op   delta
calc_something/0                    37.7      38.0  +0.79%
parse_omg_wtf/1                      1.6       1.5  -6.67%

Usage example

There is an example in examples/bench0 subdirectory.

cd examples/bench0
mkdir -p deps
ln -s `pwd`/../../ deps/emark
../../rebar compile
../../rebar emark

Details

emark works almost like eunit.

-include_lib("emark/include/emark.hrl").

-ifdef(BENCHMARK).

my_function_benchmark(N) ->
  Input = prepare_n_inputs(N),
  emark:start(?MODULE, my_function, 1),
  lists:seq(fun(E) -> _ = my_function(E) end, Input).

-endif.

The main difference is the emark:start call. It starts tracing the specified function, so it then knows how many times it was really called while benchmark was run. It also starts the actual timer, so preparation should be done before calling it.

emark prints benchmark results to the terminal. First column is the name of the function and its arity, second column is the number of iterations during the benchmark, thirs column is the average time it took the function to run (microseconds).

By default, emark also saves a report to a file under .emark/ directory. It's used on next run to show a difference between runs. So the idea behind emark is that you run benchmark (rebar emark), then change the code of some important function, and rerun benchmark to see if anything went better (or worse).

Something went wrong with that request. Please try again.