You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
A comment on my CSS-Tricks article about Recursive posed an interesting question: basically, whether the font had a way to differentiate b/d & p/q for a potential benefit for dyslexic readers.
Of course, I can’t claim that Recursive is the best solution for dyslexia, as I have zero scientific trials and very little knowledge of dyslexia. However, I can at least consider the question.
My response there:
The Casual & Cursive axes do help disambiguate the d/b p/q letters somewhat, changing from mirrored to symmetry to rotational symmetry, and changing the forms of d & b. And in a recent update, it is possible to activate Cursive letters but keep simple diagonals (k/v/w/x/y/z). Basically, these two lines:
That does differentiate d & b, but leaves the p & q in their default shapes, which may be a missed opportunity.
A q with a tail is a pretty common desire for people coming to fonts from an understanding of "schoolbook" style handwriting.
Even disregarding questions of whether it would be helpful for dyslexia, a q with a tail is very low-hanging fruit to make the Cursive style more “cursive” for most people. The q has no diacritics in Recursive, and shares metrics between Mono & Sans sources.
So, all it will take (I think) is copying part of the n.italic to the q.italic, then adding the q to the designspace rvrn.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
A comment on my CSS-Tricks article about Recursive posed an interesting question: basically, whether the font had a way to differentiate b/d & p/q for a potential benefit for dyslexic readers.
Of course, I can’t claim that Recursive is the best solution for dyslexia, as I have zero scientific trials and very little knowledge of dyslexia. However, I can at least consider the question.
My response there:
That does differentiate d & b, but leaves the p & q in their default shapes, which may be a missed opportunity.
A
q
with a tail is a pretty common desire for people coming to fonts from an understanding of "schoolbook" style handwriting.Even disregarding questions of whether it would be helpful for dyslexia, a q with a tail is very low-hanging fruit to make the Cursive style more “cursive” for most people. The q has no diacritics in Recursive, and shares metrics between Mono & Sans sources.
So, all it will take (I think) is copying part of the
n.italic
to theq.italic
, then adding the q to the designspace rvrn.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: