Dear Active Resource, It's not that I hate you or anything, but you didn't get much attention lately. There're so many alternatives out there, and I think people have made their choice to use them than you. I think it's time for you to have a big rest, peacefully in this Git repository. I will miss you, @sikachu.
…structions to use the task rather than curl (thanks to Vijay Dev for spotting this one)
caching the http version. The syntax for including an https image url in RDoc taken from http://about.travis-ci.org/docs/user/status-images. Having this in a line of its own now to make regex replacement for the API simpler!
… is anything other than github.com/rails/rails/. Even github.com/rails/rails (without the trailing slash) broke the readme links. Also change the rakefile that generates the rdoc readme accordingly
…api site, have them replaced at runtime during rdoc generation
… comments to explain what's this hack about
With the previous pattern RDoc processed railties/lib/rails/generators/rails/plugin_new/templates/test/%name%_test.rb and that resulted in a spurious "<" class.
fixes a regression introduced by b921679 require 'rdoc/task' fails if the system RDoc version is below 2.4.2 (e.g. CRuby 1.8.7)
RDoc autolinks the word "Rails" to the doc page for the Rails module. But README.rdoc is displayed in the home page at GitHub and the slashes are visible there, which is weird. We leave by now the slashes off in the file, and generate a second file for the API with them.
…e bundle exec if needed)
…ng after a new stable tag has been pushed
…s not consider a handful of ordinary Ruby files in the Rails tree as binary (and thus excluded from the API)