Skip to content
master
Switch branches/tags
Go to file
Code

Latest commit

 

Git stats

Files

Permalink
Failed to load latest commit information.
Type
Name
Latest commit message
Commit time
src
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

README.md

Tracking read/unread commits

If you work on a small to medium sized project, I believe you should probably be reading every commit the gets merged to master. I don't mean you actually have to review the diff - just read the description and glance at the diffstat. It helps you maintain some sense of who's doing what, and what's going on.

(If, on the other hand, you work at a giant company with a monorepo, then this document is not going to be very applicable to you.)

Once upon a time, I would pull master and check to see what had come down the pipe like so:

$ git pull
$ git log ORIG_HEAD..

This works, but if you don't look through the new commits then-and-there you can lose track of which ones you've looked at. I wanted a way to track the "read/unread" status of each commit, like I do with email.

Enter git-notes

Well, git gives you a way to leave notes on commits. It's called git notes. You use it like this:

$ git notes add b76598d -m 'Reviewed-by: Alex Sayers <alex@asayers.com>'

So, I started marking the commits I'd looked at by attaching a note to them. Now, the notes show up in git log and I can see which commits I've looked at, and which are still waiting to be reviewed.

$ git show b76598d
commit b76598d2028868fe70d0e038a2841caa6e477d23
Author: Joe Smith <joe@smith.net>
Date:   Fri Jan 8 08:45:16 2021 +0900

    Switch from gcc-9 to gcc-10 on macOS

Notes:
    Reviewed-by: Alex Sayers <alex@asayers.com>

Tips:

  • You can edit notes interactively like so: git notes edit <commit>.
  • You can namespace your notes with --ref if you want to keep them organised.
  • I like to make my notes look like a "trailer", because programs like tig will recognise them and highlight them nicely.

The way I think of "reviewed-by" is this: it's like the read/unread status on your emails. It doesn't imply approval, disapproval, or any judgement whatsoever. It just means that I've looked at the commit.

And remember: these comments aren't indended to be seen by anyone else; they're just for my own personal use. If you want to give authors feedback about thier commits, you should use github/gitlab/trac/gerrit/redmine/the mailing list/whatever. This is all about local, private review tracking.

Enter orpa

orpa is a tool for streamlining this workflow. It shows you the commits which don't yet have any notes attached.

$ orpa status
Current branch: The following commits are awaiting review:

  7cc8026 Use the gitlab raw Query API
  251ec84 Replace coloured with yansi
  da05da1 Document the CLI options

Review them using "orpa review"

And it has a "review" mode which lets you quickly blast through the unreviewed commits, marking them with comments as you go:

$ orpa review
commit da05da11960b59249a286999612c1fcba90dbd19
Author: Joe Smith <joe@smith.net>
Date:   Fri Feb 12 19:09:27 2021 +0900

    Document the CLI options

 src/main.rs | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

> mark
da05da11960b59249a286999612c1fcba90dbd19: Reviewed-by: Alex Sayers <alex@asayers.com>

Reviewing merge requests

Reviewing commits once they're been merged is good, but perhaps you'd like to review the incoming changes. git notes allows you to attach comments to any commit in your repo, whether it's merged to a local branch or just part of a remote branch. That means we can use our system to keep track of which MRs we've looked at.

Suppose there's an MR you want to review; the head of the MR branch is aadb1f9, and the merge-base with the target branch is 563e5fb. We can pass this range to orpa like so:

$ orpa status 563e5fb..aadb1f9
563e5fb..aadb1f9: The following commits are awaiting review:

  9fbc3f8 Make the notes ref configurable
  aadb1f9 Use Lazy for CLI opts

Review them using "orpa review 563e5fb..aadb1f9"

Configuring orpa fetch

Orpa can load the open MRs from your MR tracker and display the unreviewed commits in the same way. Currently it only supports gitlab, but support for other trackers could be added too.

Get an API token for your gitlab instance (read-only API access is enough), and put a section like this in your local git repository's .git/config file:

[gitlab]
    url = "gitlab.example.com"
    privateToken = "1234567890abcdefgijk"
    projectId = "1"
    username = "asayers"

Listing merge requests

Let's grab the latest MRs from gitlab with orpa fetch:

$ orpa fetch
Fetching open MRs for project 1 from gitlab.example.com...

Now, orpa status is giving us some new information:

$ orpa status
Merge requests with unreviewed commits:

  !84    Add --notes-ref CLI argument (2 unreviewed)

Use "orpa mr" to see the full MR information

Let's take a look at it...

$ orpa mr 84
merge_request !84
Author: Joe Smith (@jsmith)
Date:   2019-12-10 08:42:20.768 UTC

    Add --notes-ref CLI argument

    v1 563e5fb..aadb1f9 (0/2 reviewed)

And there's the range we need to pass to orpa review!

Merge request versions

So we take a look at the commits in merge request !84, and perhaps we send some feedback to Joe Smith. He pushes a new version, and now after we orpa fetch we see this:

$ orpa mr 84
merge_request !84
Author: Joe Smith (@jsmith)
Date:   2019-12-10 08:42:20.768 UTC

    Add --notes-ref CLI argument

    v1 563e5fb..aadb1f9 (2/2 reviewed)
    v2 7be3424..de31ea2 (0/3 reviewed)

All the commit hashes in v2 are completely different to v1, so orpa thinks that v2 has zero reviewed commits. We could look through the v2 commits and try to spot what's changed, but that's boring and error-prone. So instead let's use git range-diff:

$ git range-diff 563e5fb..aadb1f9 7be3424..de31ea2
1:  9fbc3f82 = 1:  ce0ad59e Make the notes ref configurable
2:  aadb1f9e = 2:  30bb419c Use Lazy for CLI opts
-:  -------- > 3:  de31ea2c Rename --hidden to --all

It turns out Joe just rebased and added a commit. Now when we do orpa review 7be3424..de31ea2 we can mark the first two as seen without thinking, and then take a closer look at the third one.

About

A tool for tracking private code review

Resources

License

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published

Languages