Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Underbraces #18

Closed
adius opened this issue Jul 23, 2014 · 3 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
2 participants
@adius
Copy link
Contributor

commented Jul 23, 2014

I think underbraces should be part of core AsciiMath.

This was already discussed in this issue: mathjax/MathJax#741

@drlippman

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented Jul 23, 2014

I'm fine with that. Should we just go with the "ubrace" token @dpvc suggested in 741?

@adius

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor Author

commented Jul 23, 2014

I think we should support both underbrace and ubrace, as some might favour readability over length, shouldn't we?

@drlippman

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented Jul 23, 2014

While the new symbol that @dpvc suggested in 741 is sufficient to get an underbrace, it doesn't appear sufficient to get ubrace(1+2+3+4)_("4 terms") to work. I'll see if I can figure a way to get the proper munder tag.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.