Underbraces #18

Closed
opened this issue Jul 23, 2014 · 3 comments

Projects
None yet
2 participants
Contributor

 I think underbraces should be part of core AsciiMath. This was already discussed in this issue: mathjax/MathJax#741
Contributor

drlippman commented Jul 23, 2014

 I'm fine with that. Should we just go with the "ubrace" token @dpvc suggested in 741?
Contributor Author

 I think we should support both underbrace and ubrace, as some might favour readability over length, shouldn't we?
Contributor

drlippman commented Jul 23, 2014

 While the new symbol that @dpvc suggested in 741 is sufficient to get an underbrace, it doesn't appear sufficient to get ubrace(1+2+3+4)_("4 terms") to work. I'll see if I can figure a way to get the proper munder tag.

drlippman added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 23, 2014

 Proposed solution to issue #18, adding overbrace and underbrace 
 180dac2 

Merged