Private recordings #34

Closed
sickill opened this Issue Feb 22, 2012 · 23 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
@sickill
Contributor

sickill commented Feb 22, 2012

No description provided.

@tolland

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@tolland

tolland Jan 9, 2013

I would find this valuable. I think this would be an opporunity for a value added paid-for feature

tolland commented Jan 9, 2013

I would find this valuable. I think this would be an opporunity for a value added paid-for feature

@trollfred

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@trollfred

trollfred Feb 19, 2013

would be useful

would be useful

@kreeger

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@kreeger

kreeger Mar 15, 2013

This would be way cool. Perhaps similar to how private gists are managed (by link/url only)?

kreeger commented Mar 15, 2013

This would be way cool. Perhaps similar to how private gists are managed (by link/url only)?

@chkelly

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chkelly

chkelly May 17, 2013

Would use this much more if this functionality existed

chkelly commented May 17, 2013

Would use this much more if this functionality existed

@shpoont

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@shpoont

shpoont Sep 30, 2013

It should be very simple to implement, just don't post it on the asciinema.org. It would double the user base (at least) , think of all the people willing to share their terminal activities to only people they know..

shpoont commented Sep 30, 2013

It should be very simple to implement, just don't post it on the asciinema.org. It would double the user base (at least) , think of all the people willing to share their terminal activities to only people they know..

@sickill

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@sickill

sickill Oct 1, 2013

Contributor

@shpoont it is very simple to implement, yes. But I am yet to decide if this feature should be free. I'm leaning towards it being free but haven't made up my mind yet.

Contributor

sickill commented Oct 1, 2013

@shpoont it is very simple to implement, yes. But I am yet to decide if this feature should be free. I'm leaning towards it being free but haven't made up my mind yet.

@ifnull

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@ifnull

ifnull Nov 11, 2013

@sickill I would gladly pay for this feature.
Take my money

ifnull commented Nov 11, 2013

@sickill I would gladly pay for this feature.
Take my money

@miend

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@miend

miend May 6, 2014

I'm going to chime in here as well. Paid privacy option seems like a great idea -- the lack of it will keep me from using this regularly at this time.

miend commented May 6, 2014

I'm going to chime in here as well. Paid privacy option seems like a great idea -- the lack of it will keep me from using this regularly at this time.

@sickill

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@sickill

sickill May 6, 2014

Contributor

If private recordings (with access control and private sharing) was to be a paid feature would you prefer to pay:

  1. small amount monthly (premium subscription) or,
  2. a little more but as a one-time payment enabling premium features (also future ones) ?
Contributor

sickill commented May 6, 2014

If private recordings (with access control and private sharing) was to be a paid feature would you prefer to pay:

  1. small amount monthly (premium subscription) or,
  2. a little more but as a one-time payment enabling premium features (also future ones) ?
@ifnull

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@ifnull

ifnull May 6, 2014

As an individual consumer, I would prefer to pay monthly. However, I could see companies wanting a one time payment option.

ifnull commented May 6, 2014

As an individual consumer, I would prefer to pay monthly. However, I could see companies wanting a one time payment option.

@shpoont

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@shpoont

shpoont May 7, 2014

The decision greatly depends on the actual prices e.g. $5 monthly vs. $10 one-time or $1 monthly vs. $20 one-time

shpoont commented May 7, 2014

The decision greatly depends on the actual prices e.g. $5 monthly vs. $10 one-time or $1 monthly vs. $20 one-time

@shurane

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@shurane

shurane Jul 31, 2014

Honestly, it would be better for you @sickill if it was a small amount monthly. $5, $10, even $20. Oh my goodness this would be such an incredibly useful feature, and it would be worth giving you an incentive to keep working on asciinema :)

shurane commented Jul 31, 2014

Honestly, it would be better for you @sickill if it was a small amount monthly. $5, $10, even $20. Oh my goodness this would be such an incredibly useful feature, and it would be worth giving you an incentive to keep working on asciinema :)

@lmammino

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@lmammino

lmammino Aug 10, 2014

👍 for this!

👍 for this!

@hotoo

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment

hotoo commented Sep 3, 2014

👍

@fusiondog

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@fusiondog

fusiondog Sep 9, 2014

If one hosted the asciinema.org code on a private server and then changed the url in the cli, wouldn't one have a private hosted version they could use within an organization?

If one hosted the asciinema.org code on a private server and then changed the url in the cli, wouldn't one have a private hosted version they could use within an organization?

@sickill

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@sickill

sickill Sep 10, 2014

Contributor

@fusiondog correct.

Contributor

sickill commented Sep 10, 2014

@fusiondog correct.

@sickill

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@sickill

sickill Nov 15, 2014

Contributor

It's almost there! (see #176)

Contributor

sickill commented Nov 15, 2014

It's almost there! (see #176)

@hardipe

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@hardipe

hardipe Feb 15, 2015

+1, really waiting for this feature!
It would definitely expand your target market in the form of companies sharing top-secret terminal playbacks among their staff.

I would pay for this feature as well.

hardipe commented Feb 15, 2015

+1, really waiting for this feature!
It would definitely expand your target market in the form of companies sharing top-secret terminal playbacks among their staff.

I would pay for this feature as well.

@KenSuenobu

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@KenSuenobu

KenSuenobu Feb 25, 2015

👍 👍 👍

I would PAY FOR THIS FEATURE.

👍 👍 👍

I would PAY FOR THIS FEATURE.

@nathany

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@nathany

nathany Mar 2, 2015

I'm with @fusiondog on this one. I'd just run a local copy as mentioned in the FAQ.

https://asciinema.org/docs/faq

nathany commented Mar 2, 2015

I'm with @fusiondog on this one. I'd just run a local copy as mentioned in the FAQ.

https://asciinema.org/docs/faq

@sickill sickill removed this from the 0.1 milestone Mar 5, 2015

@sickill

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@sickill

sickill May 11, 2015

Contributor

Good news! Private asciicasts just landed for everyone: http://blog.asciinema.org/post/private/

Contributor

sickill commented May 11, 2015

Good news! Private asciicasts just landed for everyone: http://blog.asciinema.org/post/private/

@sickill sickill closed this May 11, 2015

@hardipe

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@hardipe

hardipe May 12, 2015

That's wonderful news! I am very thankful for this feature.

It appears that you did not introduce any paid model for this. I recommend you also think of a way to monetize asciinema's usage in the future to raise funds for further development. It's a cool project!

hardipe commented May 12, 2015

That's wonderful news! I am very thankful for this feature.

It appears that you did not introduce any paid model for this. I recommend you also think of a way to monetize asciinema's usage in the future to raise funds for further development. It's a cool project!

@sickill

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@sickill

sickill May 12, 2015

Contributor

@hardipe Enjoy! No, no paid model this time. Maybe some day, we'll see. As for private asciicasts I realized that this is a really essential thing, and everyone who wants to try asciinema shouldn't be forced to auto-publish their first recordings.

Contributor

sickill commented May 12, 2015

@hardipe Enjoy! No, no paid model this time. Maybe some day, we'll see. As for private asciicasts I realized that this is a really essential thing, and everyone who wants to try asciinema shouldn't be forced to auto-publish their first recordings.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment