Skip to content

Store objects internally in msgpack#118

Merged
c-w merged 6 commits into
masterfrom
msgpack
Jan 3, 2019
Merged

Store objects internally in msgpack#118
c-w merged 6 commits into
masterfrom
msgpack

Conversation

@c-w
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@c-w c-w commented Jan 3, 2019

No description provided.

c-w added 3 commits January 2, 2019 23:22
This ensures that we store the emails in a sane format internally (i.e.
with attachment content bytes stored as bytes) and only serialize them
to the data transfer format (base64 encoded bytes) at the edges when
communicating with the clients.
@codecov-io
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov-io commented Jan 3, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #118 into master will increase coverage by 0.09%.
The diff coverage is 96.66%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #118      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   91.18%   91.28%   +0.09%     
==========================================
  Files          21       22       +1     
  Lines         885      929      +44     
==========================================
+ Hits          807      848      +41     
- Misses         78       81       +3
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
opwen_email_server/utils/email_parser.py 93.75% <100%> (-0.17%) ⬇️
opwen_email_server/utils/path.py 100% <100%> (ø)
opwen_email_server/utils/temporary.py 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
opwen_email_server/utils/serialization.py 96% <100%> (+1.26%) ⬆️
opwen_email_server/actions.py 95.33% <89.47%> (-0.65%) ⬇️
opwen_email_server/services/storage.py 95.83% <97.05%> (-0.26%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9dc97f0...1679185. Read the comment docs.

@c-w c-w merged commit 0e5cd9c into master Jan 3, 2019
@c-w c-w deleted the msgpack branch January 3, 2019 04:48
c-w pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants