Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replace azure-storage-blob with libcloud #47

merged 2 commits into from Sep 11, 2018

Replace azure-storage-blob with libcloud #47

merged 2 commits into from Sep 11, 2018


Copy link

@c-w c-w commented Sep 9, 2018

@adamsclafani tagging you as a reviewer on this pull request since it's related to your Celery refactor. This pull request replaces the azure-storage-blob library with apache-libcloud such that we can replace the Azure-based storage with the file-system for local development.

@laura-barluzzi tagging you as a reviewer for general feedback.

@c-w c-w requested a review from adamsclafani Sep 9, 2018
Copy link

@codecov-io codecov-io commented Sep 9, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #47 into master will increase coverage by 0.37%.
The diff coverage is 97.36%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #47      +/-   ##
+ Coverage   91.44%   91.82%   +0.37%     
  Files          24       24              
  Lines         830      844      +14     
+ Hits          759      775      +16     
+ Misses         71       69       -2
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
opwen_email_server/ 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
opwen_email_server/utils/ 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
opwen_email_server/services/ 97.5% <96.96%> (+2.21%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f6f27df...db9300e. Read the comment docs.

@c-w c-w merged commit db74590 into master Sep 11, 2018
3 checks passed
@c-w c-w deleted the libcloud branch Sep 11, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
None yet
None yet

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants